Australia: Why You Should (or Shouldn’t) Use a CCIV
By Kane Barnett
Australia’s new fund vehicle, the corporate collective investment vehicle (CCIV) came in to effect on 1 July 2022. Since then adoption has been meagre to say the least.
Read MoreEurope: Important Issues Still Open for Debate in EU’s AIFMD and UCITS Reviews
On 24 January 2023, the ECON Committee of the EU Parliament adopted its report on proposed amendments to the EU’s main fund rules, AIFMD and the UCITS Directive, ahead of trilogue negotiations with the EU Council and Commission set to begin in March. When agreed, the revised Directives are expected to come into force in 2025 in light of the 24 months transposition period. Notable proposals include:
Read MoreEurope: FCA Sets Ambitious Goal to Improve Asset Management Regulation in the UK
By Robert Lloyd, Maya Ffrench-Adam and Philip Morgan
On 20 February 2023, the FCA published a discussion paper (DP23/2) on improving the UK asset management regime. Key themes include:
Alignment with Relevant International Standards
The FCA does not want to create unnecessary complexity for firms operating in multiple jurisdictions. It aims to develop the regime to interact effectively with international requirements, while promoting the international competitiveness of the UK economy.
Read MoreUnited States: SEC Adopts Expanded Proxy Voting Reporting by Registered Funds and New Reporting of Executive Compensation Votes by Form 13F Filers
By: Lynn A. Schweinfurth, Kathy Kresch Ingber, and Crystal Liu
On November 2, by a vote of 3 to 2, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted, largely as proposed, amendments to Form N-PX under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and new Rule 14Ad-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendments). The Amendments expand the proxy voting information that registered investment companies (Funds) report on Form N-PX, and require, for the first time, Form 13F filers (Managers) to report annually on Form N-PX how they voted proxies concerning certain shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation (“say-on-pay” votes).
Read MoreUnited States: SEC Reopens Comment Period for Eleven Significant Rulemaking Releases
By: Trayne S. Wheeler and Brian Doyle-Wenger
On October 7, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) announced that, due to a technological error, it was reopening the public comment periods for 11 pending rulemaking releases (“Rulemaking Releases”) and one request for comment. The comment periods will be reopened as of October 7th and will end 14 days after the publication of the release in Federal Register (if, for example, this release were to be published on October 15, then the comment periods would close on October 29, 2022). The SEC encouraged commenters that submitted a public comment through the internet comment process to check the SEC’s website, SEC.gov, to determine whether their comment was received and posted.
The SEC’s release did not elaborate on nature of the technological error but stated that a number of public comments submitted through the SEC’s internet comment form were not received. The SEC noted the majority of the affected comments were submitted in August 2022, but that the technological error is known to have occurred as early as June 2021.
The impact of the reopening of the public comment periods is not yet known, but will likely result in delaying the release of a number of highly anticipated SEC rules[1]. The Rulemaking Releases include the following proposals and request for comment:
• Reporting of Securities Loans
• Prohibition Against Fraud, Manipulation, or Deception in Connection with Security-Based Swaps; Prohibition against Undue Influence over Chief Compliance Officers; Position Reporting of Large Security-Based Swap Positions
• Money Market Fund Reforms
• Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization
• Short Position and Short Activity Reporting by Institutional Investment Managers; see also Notice of the Text of the Proposed Amendments to the National Market System Plan Governing the Consolidated Audit Trail for Purposes of Short Sale-Related Data Collection,
• Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure
• Private Fund Advisers; Documentation of Registered Investment Adviser Compliance Reviews
• The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors
• Special Purpose Acquisition Companies, Shell Companies, and Projections
• Investment Company Names
• Enhanced Disclosures by Certain Investment Advisers and Investment Companies About Environmental, Social, and Governance Investment Practices
• Request for Comment on Certain Information Providers Acting as Investment Advisers
(Certain SRO rules, not covered here, also have comment periods that have been reopened.)
[1] SEC Release, Resubmission of Comments and Reopening of Comment Periods for Several Rulemaking Releases Due to a Technological Error in Receiving Certain Comments, October 7, 2022 (https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2022/33-11117.pdf)
Australia: Cybersecurity now a legal obligation for AFS Licensees
By Kane Barnett and Bernard Sia
As technology continues to drive change within the financial services industry, Australian courts and regulators have confirmed the need for Australian financial services (AFS) licensees to address the cybersecurity risks. On 5 May 2022, the Australian Federal Court ruled in favour of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), holding that AFS licensee RI Advice Group Pty Ltd (RI Advice) had breached its statutory obligations by failing to have adequate cybersecurity measures in place.
Read MoreEurope: AIFMD II – Proposed Refinements to Loan Originating Fund Proposals
By: Philipp Riedl
On 18 May 2022, the Rapporteur submitted to the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) a report suggesting changes to the EU Commission’s envisaged regulation of loan originating funds under its proposed AIFMD amendments (AIFMD II). The report includes some proposed relief, notably:
Read More