By: Jim Bulling, Simon Kiburg and Alex Parker
When assessing how to comply with the new reporting obligations, reporting entities should recognise the differences in the enforcement approach that ASIC will take in relation to mandatory climate reporting compared with the approach adopted by it in relation to Greenwashing.
Read MoreBy Hazel Doyle and Nicola McCaffrey
In an important speech, Derville Rowland, the Central Bank of Ireland’s Deputy Governor for Consumer and Investor Protection has outlined the Central Bank’s approach to ETFs in Ireland. Some of the points she made are highlighted in this blog.
Read MoreBy: Keri Riemer, Peter Shea, and Lael Franco
On 21 October 2024, the SEC’s Division of Examinations (Division) published its 2025 Examination Priorities (Priorities) to provide insight into what the Division plans to focus on in the 2025 fiscal year. In addition to other areas of risk highlighted in the Priorities, the Division has advised that it will to continue to monitor – and conduct examinations if deemed appropriate – of registrants offering crypto asset-related services, including spot bitcoin or ether exchange-traded products (ETPs). However, with respect to spot bitcoin or ether ETPs, the Division’s oversight may be limited to the ETPs’ sponsors or managers rather than the ETPs themselves.
By: Gayle Bowen and Hazel Doyle
Following a review of the Irish funds industry and wide engagement with industry participants, discussed in our earlier blog here, the Department of Finance has issued its Final Report on the Funds Sector 2030. The report sets out the Irish government’s framework and recommendations to enhance growth in the funds sector and maintain Ireland’s prominent position.
Read MoreBy: Jennifer Klass, Lance Dial, and Pablo Man
In order to discourage investment advisers, broker-dealers and investment companies from engaging in any “tricks,” the SEC’s Division of Examinations has published a treat, in the form of its 2025 Examination Priorities (the Priorities). This publication, an annual event since 2013, provides market participants with insight into what the Division of Examinations will focus on in the coming fiscal year.
Read MoreBy: C. Todd Gibson, Robert H. McCarthy Jr., and Jamie M. Robinson
The time has come to finalize those end-of-year checklists and for anyone with US entities, foreign entities doing business in the United States, or for those who are planning to form or register entities to do business in the United States, the United States Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) should be at the top of the list. This includes investment advisers and funds that they manage.
Read MoreBy: Jim Bulling and Anthony Shorten
On 11 September 2024, the Attorney-General introduced the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) to the Federal Parliament, following two periods of consultation undertaken by the Department of the Attorney-General, and AUSTRAC over 2023 and 2024.
Read MoreBy: Cheryl L. Isaac, Matthew J. Rogers, and Benjamin C. Skillin
On 12 September 2024, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) published a Final Rule impacting registered commodity pool operators (CPOs) and commodity trading advisors (CTAs) relying on the regulatory relief provided under CFTC Regulation 4.7. “Registration light,” as Regulation 4.7 is sometimes known, provides reduced disclosure, reporting and recordkeeping obligations for CPOs and CTAs that limit sales activities to “qualified eligible persons” (QEPs).
Read MoreBy: Jim Bulling and Anthony Shorten
Much of the recent media commentary on greenwashing has revolved around enforcement action taken by ASIC against entities who have misled investors or shareholders. However, there has been less discussion on best practices for entities looking to avoid greenwashing.
Read MoreBy: Pablo Man, Pamela Grossetti, Lance Dial and Jennifer Klass
On 9 September 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced settled charges against nine registered investment advisers for violations of Rule 206(4)-1 (the Marketing Rule). Unlike the prior settlements (which focused primarily on the use of hypothetical performance), these settlements focused on other elements of the Marketing Rule: (i) the prohibitions on statements of material fact that are untrue or that the adviser cannot substantiate; (ii) disclosures relating to testimonials and endorsements; and (iii) required disclosures for third-party ratings. Many of these violations were based on website disclosures. In total, nine advisers agreed to pay US$1,240,000 in combined civil penalties, ranging from US$60,000 to US$325,000.
Read MoreCopyright © 2024, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.