Category:Retail Investor Funds

1
Australia: Proposed Reforms to the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Regime
2
Europe: ESMA Advocates More Specific Restrictions on the Costs Fund Managers May Pass on to Investors
3
Australia: Preparing for the Extension of the Superannuation Performance Test to Trustee-Directed Products
4
Australia: ASIC Releases Report on Recent Greenwashing Actions
5
Australia: ASIC Revises its IDR Reporting Framework. Are You Ready?
6
Australia: ASIC Reports on DDO Compliance by Investment Product Issuers
7
Australia: Why You Should (or Shouldn’t) Use a CCIV
8
United States: SEC Staff Finds Safeguarding Policies and Procedures Lacking at Branch Offices
9
Europe: Central Bank’s Dear CEO Letter Highlights Actions to be Addressed by FMCs and AIFMs Without Delay
10
APAC: Managed Accounts and Conflicts—Part 3: Separate Managed Accounts vs. Funds of One

Australia: Proposed Reforms to the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Regime

By Daniel Knight and Grace Hall

The Australian Government has committed to reforming Australia’s AML/CTF regime, with proposed reforms aimed to strengthen and modernise the framework.

In April 2023, the Attorney-General released the first of two consultation papers outlining the proposed reforms to the regime. Subsequently, as part of the 2023-24 Federal Budget, the Government announced that it will provide $14.3 million in funding over the next four years to support policy and legislative reforms to the AML/CTF regime.

Read More

Europe: ESMA Advocates More Specific Restrictions on the Costs Fund Managers May Pass on to Investors

By Áine Ní Riain and Gayle Bowen

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has suggested that the European Commission should clarify the costs that UCITS management companies and AIFMs may pass on to investors under existing rules that prohibit “undue costs”.  Costs for this purpose include fees payable to the manager and other fund service providers and all other one-off, recurring or transaction-related costs.  The purpose of the proposed clarification would be to provide for better convergence between the approaches of different EU member states, and a better basis for national regulators to take supervisory and enforcement actions in this area.

Read More

Australia: Preparing for the Extension of the Superannuation Performance Test to Trustee-Directed Products

By Jim Bulling and Grace Hall

The release of draft regulations by the Australian Government and publications by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) provide further guidance to regulated superannuation funds on how annual performance assessments (the performance test) will apply to trustee-directed products.

Read More

Australia: ASIC Releases Report on Recent Greenwashing Actions

By Matthew Watts and Rebecca Mangos

The Australia Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) has published a report on its regulatory interventions made between 1 July 2022 and 31 March 2023 in relation to greenwashing concerns (which can be accessed here). The report covers ASIC’s issuance of greenwashing infringement notices during the period and its observed increase in representations made by listed companies, managed funds and superannuation funds on environmental, social and governance credentials.

Read More

Australia: ASIC Revises its IDR Reporting Framework. Are You Ready?

By Daniel Knight and Hugo Chow

All holders of an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL) with a retail client authorisation will need to comply with ASIC’s internal dispute resolution (IDR) reporting framework. Summary reports will need to be provided to ASIC on a 6 monthly basis, highlighting the status of each client complaint. Reporting obligations commence from 1 July 2023 (for reporting in January or February 2024). AFSL holders should put systems in place now to ensure all required information is being captured.

Read More

Australia: ASIC Reports on DDO Compliance by Investment Product Issuers

By Kane Barnett and Bernard Sia

On 3 May 2023 the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) released its review on compliance by investment product issuers of the Design and Distribution Obligations (DDOs). In ASIC’s view, there is still considerable room for improvement by product issuers.

Read More

Australia: Why You Should (or Shouldn’t) Use a CCIV

By Kane Barnett

Australia’s new fund vehicle, the corporate collective investment vehicle (CCIV) came in to effect on 1 July 2022. Since then adoption has been meagre to say the least.

Read More

United States: SEC Staff Finds Safeguarding Policies and Procedures Lacking at Branch Offices

By: Keri Riemer and Brian Doyle-Wenger

On 26 April, 2023, shortly after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed rule amendments that would require broker-dealers and investment advisers (collectively, firms) to comply with enhanced compliance requirements relating to sensitive customer information, the SEC’s Division of Examinations (staff) issued a risk alert highlighting the need for firms to have written policies and procedures for safeguarding customer records and information at their branch offices.

Read More

Europe: Central Bank’s Dear CEO Letter Highlights Actions to be Addressed by FMCs and AIFMs Without Delay

By Gayle Bowen and Áine Ní Riain

On 24 March, the Central Bank of Ireland issued a “Dear Chair” letter following its review in 2021 of the costs and fees charged to UCITS as part of the ESMA Common Supervisory Action (the CSA).

The letter, which is addressed to Irish UCITS fund management companies (FMCs), sets out the Central Bank’s main findings from the 2021 review and its expectations on actions to be taken by FMCs to address deficiencies identified. Despite the focus being on UCITS FMCs, the Central Bank specifically emphasises that it will expect its findings and actions to be considered also by Irish AIFMs with reference to AIFs under management.

Read More

APAC: Managed Accounts and Conflicts—Part 3: Separate Managed Accounts vs. Funds of One

By Scott Peterman

In our last post, we itemized several incentives motivating many institutional investors to favor management of their investment assets in a separate managed account (SMA) or fund-of-one as opposed to investing those assets in a commingled fund. A key distinction between investing assets in an SMA or fund-of-one that is often overlooked is that the owner/investor in an SMA directly owns those investment assets. This is not true of an investor investing in a fund-of-one. In the latter, the fund owns those assets, not the investor. 

Read More

Copyright © 2024, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.