Investment Manager Regulation – Page 2 – Global Investment Law Watch

United States: Cooking the Books: CFTC Turns Up the Heat on Voluntary Carbon Market Fraudsters

Oct 17 2024

By: Cheryl L. Isaac, Clifford C. Histed, and Benjamin C. Skillin

On 2 October 2024, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced multiple actions related to fraud in the voluntary carbon credit (VCC) market, just over one year after establishing the Environmental Fraud Task Force. Specifically, the CFTC filed a complaint in federal court against the former CEO of a carbon credit project developer and, on the same day, settled charges against CQC Impact Investors LLC (CQC) and its former COO, all related to a deceptive scheme purportedly intended to reduce carbon emissions.

United States: Why the CTA Should Be at the Top of Your End-of-Year Checklist

Oct 15 2024

By: C. Todd Gibson, Robert H. McCarthy Jr., and Jamie M. Robinson

The time has come to finalize those end-of-year checklists and for anyone with US entities, foreign entities doing business in the United States, or for those who are planning to form or register entities to do business in the United States, the United States Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) should be at the top of the list. This includes investment advisers and funds that they manage.

United States: Extra Credit Projects: SEC Settles Charges Against Carbon Offset Project Developer for US$250 Million Offering Fraud

Oct 07 2024

By: Pablo Man and Benjamin Skillin

On 2 October 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced settled charges against one of the largest carbon credit project developers (the Developer), for fraudulently altering data concerning its business and making material misrepresentations in the offering of equity to institutional investors in the United States. The SEC’s order found that the Developer violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

Europe: New Irish Fast-Track Filing Process for Fund Name Changes To Comply With ESG-Related Rules

Oct 01 2024

By: Áine Ní Riain and Gayle Bowen

The Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) has announced a streamlined filing process for Irish UCITS and AIFs seeking to change their name to comply with the European Securities and Markets Authority’s guidelines on funds’ names using ESG or sustainability-related terms (the Guidelines).

United States: D, F, G, 3, 4, 5: Firms Charged for Failing to Make Section 13 and 16 Filings

Sep 26 2024

By: Pablo J. Man, C. Todd Gibson, and Lisa N. Ju

On 25 September 2024, the SEC announced settled charges against 23 entities and individuals for failing to make timely filings about their holdings and transactions on Schedules 13D and 13G and on Forms 3, 4 and 5, pursuant to Sections 13 and 16 of the 1934 Act, respectively. The individuals charged were officers, directors and/or beneficial owners of publicly traded companies that failed to make “insider” filings. Two firms were charged for contributing to their officers’ and directors’ failures to file insider reports and for failing to comply with their own disclosure obligations to report such delinquencies. The penalties ranged from US$10,000 to US$750,000, and in the aggregate exceeded US$3.8 million.

United States: DOL Fiduciary Rule: The Saga Continues With Eleventh Hour Appeal of Fiduciary Rule Stay

Sep 23 2024

By: Robert L. Sichel and Ruth E. Delaney

In July, two federal district courts in Texas stayed the effective date (slated for 23 September) of the Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) amended fiduciary rule that would define when a financial professional is acting as a “fiduciary” under ERISA by virtue of providing nondiscretionary investment advice to participants in 401(k) plans, IRAs, and similar clients. On Friday 20 September 2024, the DOL informed the courts that the DOL is appealing to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to reverse the lower courts’ decisions.

United States: Firms Fail to File 13Fs, Fines Follow

Sep 18 2024

By: C. Todd Gibson, Pablo J. Man, and Brian Doyle-Wenger

On 17 September 2024, the SEC announced settled charges against 11 institutional investment managers for failing to file Form 13F. In addition, two of the 11 firms also failed to file Forms 13H as large traders. The penalties ranged from US$175,000 to US$725,000, and in the aggregate exceeded US$3 million combined. However, two firms self-reported and paid no penalties and one firm self-reported Form 13H filing violations and paid no penalties on that portion of the settlement. Furthermore, all of the institutional investment managers made remedial filings covering several years (in one case over 50 such filings).

United States: End of Summer Pool Party: CFTC Approves Final Rule Amending 4.7 Regulatory Relief for CPOs and CTAs

Sep 17 2024

By: Cheryl L. Isaac, Matthew J. Rogers, and Benjamin C. Skillin

On 12 September 2024, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) published a Final Rule impacting registered commodity pool operators (CPOs) and commodity trading advisors (CTAs) relying on the regulatory relief provided under CFTC Regulation 4.7. “Registration light,” as Regulation 4.7 is sometimes known, provides reduced disclosure, reporting and recordkeeping obligations for CPOs and CTAs that limit sales activities to “qualified eligible persons” (QEPs).

United States: Gee, Have You Thought About Your 13G? (New Reporting Compliance Deadlines Start at Month-End)

Sep 10 2024

By: Pablo J. Man, C. Todd Gibson, and Lisa N. Ju

Updated on 26 September 2024

Starting 30 September 2024, the amendments to the Section 13 beneficial ownership rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendments), as they relate to initial and amended Schedule 13G filings come into effect. The new accelerated deadlines for initial and amendment filings vary by investor type, as follows:

United States: More Marketing Missteps

Sep 10 2024

By: Pablo Man, Pamela Grossetti, Lance Dial and Jennifer Klass

On 9 September 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced settled charges against nine registered investment advisers for violations of Rule 206(4)-1 (the Marketing Rule). Unlike the prior settlements (which focused primarily on the use of hypothetical performance), these settlements focused on other elements of the Marketing Rule: (i) the prohibitions on statements of material fact that are untrue or that the adviser cannot substantiate; (ii) disclosures relating to testimonials and endorsements; and (iii) required disclosures for third-party ratings. Many of these violations were based on website disclosures. In total, nine advisers agreed to pay US$1,240,000 in combined civil penalties, ranging from US$60,000 to US$325,000.

Category:Investment Manager Regulation