Category:Institutional Investors

1
APAC: Managed Accounts and Conflicts—Part 4: Separate Managed Accounts vs. Funds-of-One
2
Australia: Why You Should (or Shouldn’t) Use a CCIV
3
United States: SEC Staff Finds Safeguarding Policies and Procedures Lacking at Branch Offices
4
APAC: Managed Accounts and Conflicts—Part 3: Separate Managed Accounts vs. Funds of One
5
Singapore: MAS Publishes Observations From Inspection of Venture Capital Fund Managers
6
APAC: Managed Accounts and Conflicts—Part 2: Managed Accounts vs. Commingled Funds
7
Australia: Registered scheme and CCIV compliance: Obligation to give notice of members’ rights
8
People’s Republic of China: First QDLP Managed by WFOE PFM Launched in Shanghai
9
People’s Republic of China: CSRC Expanding Registration Based IPO Regime
10
Europe: ELTIF 2.0 Has Been Published

Australia: Why You Should (or Shouldn’t) Use a CCIV

By Kane Barnett

Australia’s new fund vehicle, the corporate collective investment vehicle (CCIV) came in to effect on 1 July 2022. Since then adoption has been meagre to say the least.

Read More

United States: SEC Staff Finds Safeguarding Policies and Procedures Lacking at Branch Offices

By: Keri Riemer and Brian Doyle-Wenger

On 26 April, 2023, shortly after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed rule amendments that would require broker-dealers and investment advisers (collectively, firms) to comply with enhanced compliance requirements relating to sensitive customer information, the SEC’s Division of Examinations (staff) issued a risk alert highlighting the need for firms to have written policies and procedures for safeguarding customer records and information at their branch offices.

Read More

APAC: Managed Accounts and Conflicts—Part 3: Separate Managed Accounts vs. Funds of One

By Scott Peterman

In our last post, we itemized several incentives motivating many institutional investors to favor management of their investment assets in a separate managed account (SMA) or fund-of-one as opposed to investing those assets in a commingled fund. A key distinction between investing assets in an SMA or fund-of-one that is often overlooked is that the owner/investor in an SMA directly owns those investment assets. This is not true of an investor investing in a fund-of-one. In the latter, the fund owns those assets, not the investor. 

Read More

Singapore: MAS Publishes Observations From Inspection of Venture Capital Fund Managers

By Edward Bennett and Jordan Seah

Earlier this year, selected market participants were issued a report from MAS on observations from its 2022 inspection of licensed Venture Capital Fund Managers (“VCFMs”).

Having requested that MAS publish its report more widely, the circular is now publicly available here.

Read More

APAC: Managed Accounts and Conflicts—Part 2: Managed Accounts vs. Commingled Funds

By Scott Peterman

In our last post, we suggested that managed accounts of whatever structure have become more and more popular among institutional investors. Our list included advantages of managed accounts often seen in print or discussed among panel participants in seminars. We did not, however, itemize all of the incentives motivating many institutional investors to prefer managed accounts over commingled funds. We’ll do so now to introduce and illuminate the reasons why and how conflicts of interest are created when fund managers manage separate client accounts alongside commingled funds. And, hopefully, give you some takeaways when managing your own investment management business.

Read More

Australia: Registered scheme and CCIV compliance: Obligation to give notice of members’ rights

By Matthew Watts and Rebecca Mangos

As the end of the 2023 financial year fast approaches, responsible entities and CCIV corporate directors should be reminded of their obligation to notify members by 30 June 2023 of their rights to elect and request to receive certain documents in physical or electronic form.

Read More

People’s Republic of China: First QDLP Managed by WFOE PFM Launched in Shanghai

By Chloe Duan and Grace Ye

In 2016, the China Securities Regulatory Commission launched the wholly foreign-owned enterprise private fund manager (WFOE PFM) program to encourage foreign fund managers to make investments in China with money raised in China. With the launching of the first Qualified Domestic Limited Partner (QDLP) fund managed by a WFOE PFM in March 2023, foreign fund managers now have the choice to decide where to invest globally with the funds raised in China.

Read More

People’s Republic of China: CSRC Expanding Registration Based IPO Regime

By Chloe Duan and Grace Ye

The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) released a series of rules on reform of the regulatory regime for initial public offering (IPO) on Chinese stock exchanges (Reform). The Reform essentially expands the registration-based IPO regime (Registration Regime) to the main boards at the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange.

Read More

Europe: ELTIF 2.0 Has Been Published

By Philipp Riedl

On 15 March 2023, amendments to the EU Regulation on the European Long-Term Investment Fund (ELTIF) were published in the Official Journal of the European Union.  They will apply from 10 January 2024.

Read More

Copyright © 2024, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.