By Jim Bulling and Anabelle Weinberg
The ASIC Annual Forum was held on 3 – 4 November 2022 with a number of significant announcements being made.
Firstly, ASIC has for the first time announced their enforcement priorities for 2023. ASIC now intends to do this on an annual basis.
Read MoreBy Jim Bulling and Anabelle Weinberg
1. ASIC takes its first ‘greenwashing’ action
ASIC has taken its first ‘greenwashing’ action against Tlou Energy Limited (Tlou). Tlou has paid a total of $53,280 to comply with four infringement notices issued by ASIC over concerns about alleged false or misleading sustainability-related statements. Tlou have not admitted guilt.
Read MoreBy: Eden L. Rohrer, Chloe Vargas, and Raymond F. Jensen
On October 12, 2022, the SEC voted to adopt new electronic recordkeeping requirements for broker-dealers in an effort to modernize recordkeeping requirements and to allow broker-dealers to use new technologies to satisfy their obligations. The new recordkeeping requirements will amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) Rule 17a-4 (“Rule 17a-4”) for broker-dealers and Exchange Act Rule 18a-6 (“Rule 18a-6”) for Security-Based Swap Dealers, and Major Security-Based Swap Participants.
Significant to broker-dealers is that they will no longer be required to preserve electronic records in a non-rewritable, non-erasable or read once, write many (“WORM”) format. The new rule is technology neutral, allowing broker-dealers to adopt new technologies. The amended rule will eliminate references to outdated technology such as “micrographic media,” “microfilm or microfiche,” and “optical disk technology (including CD-ROM),” in their heyday when the rule was adopted in 1997.
Read MoreBy: Richard F. Kerr and Keri E. Riemer
The SEC has made a new crypto move – and its impact is broad.
As described in our FinTech Law Watch blog published on 29 July 2022, the SEC recently declared that 9 crypto assets were “securities” in a complaint relating to insider trading violations (Wahi Complaint).
Read MoreBy Daniel Knight and Simon Kiburg
ASIC have announced the first enforcement action it has taken in relation to the Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO), which were introduced late last year. The enforcement action shows that, as described by ASIC deputy chair Karen Chester, “ASIC’s focus has now shifted to compliance. Industry has had sufficient time to bed down its implementation of the DDO regime.“
Read MoreBy Daniel Knight and Kithmin Ranamukhaarachchi
In the wake of the drawn out cryptocurrency market downturn, increased regulation of the sector seems inevitable. With nearly one million Australians transacting in cryptocurrencies last year, there have been widespread calls to enact additional protections for retail investors.
Read MoreBy: Stacy L. Fuller, Clifford C. Histed, Cheryl L. Isaac, Richard F. Kerr, Keri E. Riemer, and Peter J. Shea
On Thursday, Grayscale Investments, LLC (Grayscale) filed suit against the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) in the D.C. Circuit asking the court to reconsider the agency’s rejection of listing a spot Bitcoin ETP on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). In its appeal, Grayscale argued that the SEC’s ruling regarding its spot Bitcoin ETP was “arbitrary and capricious,” because it disregarded facts about the ETP and erroneously determined that listing the ETP would be in contravention of NYSE’s duties under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Read MoreBy Daniel Knight and Alex Morrison
The Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has said that the Government intends to regulate Buy Now Pay Later Products (BNPL Products) and stop the “argument about whether [they’re] credit or not”.
Read MoreBy: Andrew M. Hinkes, Eden L. Rohrer, and Judie Rinearson
The “Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act” lays out a bold agenda for legal reform related to digital assets. Although a detailed summary of Bill is still forthcoming, here’s an abbreviated summary of 10 impactful provisions. For a more fulsome summary, see our full posting on the K&L Gates FinTech Law Blog.
This Bill would radically change the way that regulated entities interact with digital assets in the U.S.. While the Bill is unlikely to pass this year, it is the product of significant bipartisan effort, and will likely lead to significant regulation of digital assets in the coming years.
Stay tuned for more in-depth coverage of the securities law and commodities law implications of amendments suggested in the Lummis-Gillibrand Bill.
By: Clifford C. Histed, Cheryl L. Isaac, and Christine Mikhael
On 2 June 2022, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed a complaint against crypto exchange Gemini Trust Company, LLC (Gemini) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for allegedly making false or misleading statements of material facts to the CFTC related to the bitcoin futures contract that Gemini launched on its exchange in 2017. If successful in this litigation, the CFTC would impose a derivatives trading and registration ban on Gemini and its employees, in addition to civil monetary penalties and profit disgorgement.
According to the CFTC’s complaint, Gemini intended to self-certify its bitcoin futures contract, and it engaged with CFTC staff between July and December 2017 in connection with the self-certification. The bitcoin futures contract was to be cash-settled by reference to the underlying bitcoin price, determined by the daily bitcoin auction that took place on the Gemini Exchange. In its complaint, the CFTC alleges that the Gemini bitcoin futures contract and related spot auction were readily susceptible to manipulation.
Specifically, the CFTC alleges that:
The CFTC emphasized in its complaint that the bitcoin futures contract was particularly significant because it was to be among the first digital asset futures contracts listed on a U.S. derivatives exchange. This action makes clear regulators’ intense focus of crypto assets, and the stakes are high: If the CFTC is successful, Gemini and its employees and agents would effectively be banned from U.S. derivatives markets, in addition to being subject to civil monetary penalties and profit disgorgement. CFTC Chairman Rostin Behnam has previously warned that the agency’s recent crypto-related enforcement actions were just the “tip of the iceberg,” and the Gemini lawsuit is evidence that there are more enforcement actions to come.
Copyright © 2024, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.