Author:Lianna Inthavong

1
Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN Reporting; Guidance on Open-End Fund Liquidity Risk
2
The SEC Is Not Done Bringing Enforcement Actions for Off-Channel Communications
3
5th Circuit Vacates the Private Fund Adviser Rules in Full
4
Marketing Rule Enforcement Remains Priority: SEC Charges Five Advisers for Marketing Rule Violations
5
FinCEN Proposes AML Requirements on Registered Investment Advisers (including Exempt Reporting Advisers)
6
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Hears Oral Arguments in Industry Groups’ Ongoing Petition to Vacate Private Fund Adviser Rules
7
SEC Expands Definition of Dealers and Government Securities Dealers
8
CFTC Requests Comment on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in CFTC-Regulated Markets

Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN Reporting; Guidance on Open-End Fund Liquidity Risk

By: Jon-Luc Dupuy, Nicholas O. Ersoy, and Jordan A. Knight

On 28 August 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments to Rule 30b1-9 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and Forms N-PORT and N-CEN (Final Rule). More specifically, the SEC adopted rule and form amendments that will: (1) require certain registered investment companies, including registered open-end funds, registered closed-end funds, and exchange traded funds organized as unit investment trusts but excluding money market funds, that report on Form N-PORT to file such reports on a monthly basis within thirty (30) days after the end of that month (rather than filing no later than sixty (60) days after the end of the fiscal quarter for the three (3) months in such quarter as currently required); and (2) amend Form N-CEN to require open-end funds to report certain information about service providers used to comply with liquidity risk management program requirements, among other technical amendments to the relevant rule and forms.

Read More

The SEC Is Not Done Bringing Enforcement Actions for Off-Channel Communications

By: Pablo J. Man and Lance C. Dial

Following a number of eyebrow-raising settlements with broker-dealers and dual registrants and a standalone investment adviser, on 14 August 2024 the SEC settled charges against 26 broker-dealers, investment advisers, and dual registrants for recordkeeping failures related to off-channel communications. The combined monetary penalties totaled nearly US$393 million, with individual penalties ranging from US$400,000 to US$50 million. The SEC noted that three of the firms (which paid US$5.5 million, US$4.5 million, and US$1.6 million penalties) self-reported their violations and consequently paid “significantly less” than they otherwise would have.

Read More

5th Circuit Vacates the Private Fund Adviser Rules in Full

By: Pablo J. Man, TJ Bright, Kenneth Holston, Christopher W. Phillips-Hart, and Tristen C. Rodgers

Earlier today, 5 June 2024, the US Fifth Circuit Court fully vacated the Private Fund Adviser Rules (PFAR) in a unanimous and highly anticipated decision curbing the Securities and Exchange Commission’s authority to regulate private funds. Absent a successful appeal of the decision, the PFAR will not come into effect.

Read More

Marketing Rule Enforcement Remains Priority: SEC Charges Five Advisers for Marketing Rule Violations

By: Lance C. Dial, Pablo J. Man, Pamela A. Grossetti, and Bradley D. Bostwick

On 12 April 2024, the SEC announced the settlement of charges against five registered investment advisers for violations of Rule 206(4)-1 under the Advisers Act (Marketing Rule). The allegations in these settlements will be familiar: the SEC determined that the five firms advertised hypothetical performance to the general public on their websites. As noted in prior settlements, the SEC takes the view that hypothetical performance should not be included on a firm’s public website, because public website disclosure does not allow firms to ensure that (through the adoption and implementation of policies and procedures) the hypothetical performance is “relevant to the likely situation and investment objectives of each advertisement’s intended audience”, as required under the Marketing Rule. 

Read More

FinCEN Proposes AML Requirements on Registered Investment Advisers (including Exempt Reporting Advisers)

By: Richard F. Kerr, Jennifer L. Klass, and Annabelle H. North

On 13 February 2024, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that would impose anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CFT) requirements on Securities and Exchange Commission-registered investment advisers (the SEC, and such investment advisers, RIAs) and exempt reporting advisers (ERAs). FinCEN previously made similar rule proposals in both 2003 and 2015, which were never finalized.

Read More

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Hears Oral Arguments in Industry Groups’ Ongoing Petition to Vacate Private Fund Adviser Rules

By: TJ Bright, Annabelle H. North, and Bradley D. Bostwick

On 5 February 2024, the US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and industry groups representing private investment fund sponsors, in the industry groups’ ongoing petition to vacate the new private fund adviser rules (PFAR) adopted by the SEC on 23 August 2023.

Read More

SEC Expands Definition of Dealers and Government Securities Dealers

By: Richard F. Kerr, Eden L. Rohrer, Jessica D. Cohn, and Raymond F. Jensen

On 6 February 2024, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted two new rules – Rules 3a5-4 and 3a44-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act) – that significantly expand the definitions of a “dealer” and “government securities dealer.” The new rules define the phrase “as a part of a regular business” in Sections 3(a)(5) and 3(a)(44) of the Act to determine if a person is engaged in a “regular pattern of buying and selling securities that has the effect of providing liquidity to other market participants.” Such persons would be required to register as “dealers” or “government securities dealers” under Sections 15 and 15C of the Act, respectively.

Read More

CFTC Requests Comment on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in CFTC-Regulated Markets

By: Cheryl L. Isaac, Matthew J. Rogers, and Benjamin C. Skillin

On 25 January, 2024, multiple Divisions of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued a Request for Comment (RFC) on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in CFTC-regulated derivatives markets. The RFC seeks information on the current and potential uses of AI as well as the risks associated with using it. The RFC is intended to complement the Biden Administration’s Executive Order urging federal agencies to promote the safe, secure, and trustworthy development of AI. The CFTC staff views the RFC as an opportunity to “identify the highest priorities and return-on-investment projects with AI use cases” and enhance the CFTC’s data-driven approach to policy, surveillance, and enforcement.

Read More

Copyright © 2023, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.